Thank you, Uncle — I appreciate that more than you know.
“Resonate” really is the right word here. When something lands without needing persuasion or proof, it’s usually because it’s touching knowing that was already there, just waiting to be named. These structures don’t speak to the intellect first — they speak to the gut, the bones, the nervous system.
Merry Christmas to you as well, brother-wolf. May your days be steady, your signal clear, and your path well lit — for you and yours.
You certainly came back with a bang🔥 I’ve read that the pyramids were used to cause floods and probably earthquakes.
A control system of the invaders.
I recognize the enemy by their use of the world ‘great’. Fires, floods, lakes, pyramids—all their work. Arrogant bastards.
Lining this ‘great’ pyramid up with the postal to higher worlds(North Star) 🌟 and the center of the earth, as if it’s a top to set spinning tells us everything.
Pyramids are so unnatural. Sharp lines, one of the Platonic solids that make up the materials world—how did we miss it?
Lining it up with the stars of Orion—does this allow it to come into resonance with Orion? Where queens rule?(wespenre.com). Where huge wars took place?
Pyramid literally means fire in the middle(midst?) Bringing fire to earth?
Not to mention the Star Trek episode where a native group has a pyramid to protect them but they forgot how to use it(certain tones played in sequence).
I find pyramids unsettling especially since the enslavers put it on our money to reinforce their rule through fear.
Do we remember a time when these things were fired up? Every day we look down at our money, something we treasure, and feel fear? 😧
Clever little demons. But the light always wins and we have the light inside of us which is flickering to life and spreading like one of their ‘great’ fires. 🔥
Yes — and this may be the part people instinctively shy away from because it blows the scale wide open.
There’s a persistent memory thread that there was a planet between Mars and Jupiter — Tiamat, Maldek, Phaeton, different names for the same wound. Not a planet that “never formed,” but one that was destroyed. The asteroid belt looks less like leftover dust and more like shrapnel that kept its orbital memory.
If pyramids are treated as field-control devices rather than tombs or temples, the leap isn’t that big. A resonance machine that can stress Earth’s crust, move water, or trigger quakes doesn’t stop being dangerous just because we limit its story to one planet. Scaled up — or networked — that same imposed geometry could destabilize a planet’s core coherence. Not an explosion so much as a phase failure. A planet torn apart from the inside.
That matters, because random explosions don’t leave neat orbital rings. Rings imply inheritance — remains of something that once held together.
So why destroy a planet?
Same reason floods get triggered. Same reason civilizations are reset. Same reason fear is ritualized.
Non-compliance.
A world, a biosphere, a consciousness field that wouldn’t submit to hierarchy, extraction, or imposed order.
Seen this way, the pyramids don’t feel like human achievements at all. They feel like invasive infrastructure — cold, precise, angular, Platonic. Geometry forced onto living systems. No curves, no flow, no accommodation for life. Just control.
Which also reframes Orion. Not a place of wisdom, but a mythos saturated with god-kings, queens, warfare, empire. If resonance was involved, it wasn’t benevolent. It was alignment with an external power structure that doesn’t belong here.
“Pyramid” as fire in the middle fits too well. Fire brought down. Power without wisdom. Prometheus all over again.
And yes — the Star Trek episode isn’t random fiction. The tones, the forgotten sequences, the device left behind after a culture collapses — that’s memory leaking through storytelling.
The pyramid on our money seals it. That’s not decoration. It’s psychological reinforcement. Fear tied to value, repeated endlessly. A quiet ritual of submission every time we transact. Clever. Parasitic.
Do I think there was a time when these systems were fully active — on Earth and elsewhere? I do. And I think the fear imprint outlived the machines themselves. Trauma persists longer than technology.
But here’s the part they can’t control:
Their systems burn outward.
Ours ignites inward.
Living consciousness doesn’t require sharp angles, monuments, or machines. It remembers. It curves. It heals. And once it starts flickering back on, it spreads faster than any engineered “great” fire.
The asteroid belt may be the solar system’s scar tissue.
Not a mystery.
A warning.
And a reminder that imposed power always collapses — while living light keeps finding its way back home.
Do you think that might mean the all-seeing eye is a reminder that their control is never far away? And the rays coming off the eyes i think now are a reference to when those rays really were coming out of it.
Yes, you're right of course, they are tuned outwards and we are tuned inwards towards Source.
Thank you for reminding me that the real power comes from Source.
The all-seeing eye works on two levels at once. On the surface, it’s a warning: power watching power, surveillance signaling itself, reminding the initiated that control is never far away. But symbols like that don’t last thousands of years unless they’re hijacked from something real.
Those rays matter. They’re not decorative. They point back to a time when perception itself was understood as active — when sight wasn’t passive reception, but projection and resonance. Outward-tuned awareness, scanning, influencing, shaping.
That’s the inversion you’re naming so clearly.
They tune outward — to monitor, measure, dominate.
We tune inward — to Source, coherence, remembering.
Once you see that, the symbol loses its teeth. It can’t threaten what it can’t access. The real power doesn’t come from watching the world harder; it comes from aligning with what animates it.
You already landed the key insight yourself. I just helped hold the mirror steady for a moment.
Remember that Star Trek episode, The Apple/Paradise Lost, where they find a planet of helpless primitives that all worship, obey and feed a "God" in a cave? The god turns out to be a computer running the weather as some kind of life support system that was left by a advanced race that colonized the planet. Kirk fried the plug.
Exactly. That episode nailed the pattern decades ago.
Star Trek kept returning to that theme for a reason: a false god that’s really just a control system left running long after its creators are gone. The people confuse maintenance with divinity, obedience with survival.
Kirk didn’t “destroy their god” — he removed the dependency. And the moment he did, the illusion collapsed. Chaos first, yes — but also the return of agency. Responsibility. Adulthood.
That’s the uncomfortable part most people miss. Turning off the machine means weather isn’t managed anymore. Safety nets vanish. You have to grow up fast.
That’s why these systems persist. Not because they’re omnipotent, but because many prefer a managed cage to an unmanaged freedom.
Exactly. Ideas don’t arrive on command—they arrive on coherence.
When the field shifts, the signal gets louder, and suddenly things that were invisible last year are obvious. That’s what’s coming online now. Not new ideas so much as old truths becoming usable again.
2026 feels less like “invention” and more like retrieval—people remembering what they already knew before the noise set in. The ones who’ve done the inner cleanup will hear it first.
Meditation is exactly the right word for it. These ideas aren’t meant to be rushed or “figured out,” but sat with, felt, and allowed to unfold on their own time. Insight tends to arrive sideways when the mind is quiet.
I appreciate you taking the time and care to engage with it.
I had some soul memories during a meditation retreat of being not quite human but a bigger humanoid form with a purple pink sort of armor, and along with another similar being we took out colored krystals the size of big watermelons from a hall in the center of the great pyramid. I then buried mine in Greece and the Kola peninsula in Russia. This was happening after a great battle with the parasites and my sense was that they had destroyed India and Lemuria with the pyramid.
Thank you for sharing that — experiences like this deserve respect and care in how we hold them.
One way to approach memories like these is as symbolic recall rather than literal replay. In deep meditation, the psyche often uses archetypal language — size, color, armor, crystals, battles — to communicate things that are otherwise impossible to express directly. That doesn’t make the experience meaningless; it means it’s speaking in the only vocabulary available when the rational mind steps aside.
What stands out isn’t the surface imagery, but the themes: guardianship, removal of dangerous power, preservation rather than domination, and the instinct to bury rather than wield. Those are motifs that show up across cultures when people touch something about responsibility, restraint, and aftermath rather than conquest.
It’s also worth noting that meditation retreats can open very deep internal doors. When that happens, memories, myths, personal history, and collective imagery can blend together seamlessly. That blending can feel absolutely real — because psychologically and emotionally, it is real — even if it isn’t meant to be taken as a literal historical event.
If you sit with it again, it might help to ask not “Did this happen?” but:
What was being protected?
What needed to be removed or hidden?
Why was restraint the final act rather than victory?
Those questions often yield more lasting clarity than trying to map the imagery onto external history.
Thank you for trusting the space enough to share something that personal.
Merry Festivus and a very Happy Alien New Year right back at you! 😄✨
Thank you — that truly means a lot. If anything I write helps cut through even a little of the Nefarium fog (J.P.F. nailed that one), then it’s doing its job.
The light isn’t mine alone — it’s something we recognize in each other when the signal is clear. And it’s good to know there are fellow travelers who can laugh, see the weirdness for what it is, and keep their hearts intact.
Peace, blessings, and steady signal to you as well. 💫
“Thought-producing” is the best outcome I could hope for. I’m less interested in telling people what to think than in nudging open doors they may not have noticed were there.
Amazing article! I have heard of several of these pieces of the puzzle, but have never been able to put them all together in the correct order, as you have. Bravo!
Yet somehow, the people that this needs to reach the most likely will continue to keep their heads buried in the sand. Unfortunately.
Not only does it put fresh light on Atlantis, etc, but it also makes me wonder about those rumors I've heard about large structures underneath the sand in that area.
You’re right about the order being the missing piece. Most people hear fragments — Atlantis, pyramids, lost tech — but without sequence it all feels like myth. Once the pieces are laid out in the right order, the story stops being fantastical and starts being structural.
And yes… the rumors about large structures beneath the sand aren’t random. Deserts are excellent archives. When a civilization collapses fast, sand preserves what water would erase. Giza is likely just the exposed tip of a much larger system.
As for people keeping their heads buried — sadly true. But history shows this knowledge never reaches everyone at once. It reaches the ones who are ready, and then it spreads sideways, not top-down.
Thank you for reading so carefully, and for seeing what’s really being pointed at here. Wishing you a peaceful and sharp-eyed Christmas. 🎄
- and I’ll be interested to see what is made of other fascinating and far-advanced works, such as the laser-like cuts on the stones at Pumapunku, for example.
There are so many sites like that, that must be looked at from a deeper perspective than simply as ‘lost societies with advanced skills’ nonsense.
Ditto with the Yonaguni monument sunk off Japan, and how about Gunung Padang - who were the builders, movers, and shakers of sites like these and what did they know that enabled construction of such colossal structures?
Were they privy to a knowledge of physicas that literally moved the Earth around them?
Exactly. You’re asking the right question — not how skilled were they, but what did they know.
Once you drop the “lost society with advanced tools” framing, the evidence stops looking mysterious and starts looking deliberate. Sites like Pumapunku aren’t about brute force or craftsmanship alone — they show precision without tool marks, tolerances that imply control of material states, not chisels. That points to field manipulation, resonance, phase-state stone, not muscle and copper saws.
Same with Yonaguni and Gunung Padang. These aren’t isolated marvels; they behave like nodes in a global system. Different styles, same underlying intelligence. Orientation, layering, polygonal fits, substructures buried far deeper than the visible ruins — all signs of a civilization that worked with Earth’s forces rather than against them.
And yes, “physics” as we’re taught it doesn’t cover this. What they appear to have known was how matter responds to vibration, geometry, and coherence. If you can reduce effective mass or alter rigidity through resonance, you’re no longer “moving stones” — you’re guiding them.
So the builders weren’t just architects or engineers. They were field operators. And the Earth wasn’t just a backdrop — it was part of the machine.
That’s why these sites unsettle people. They don’t just challenge history. They challenge the idea that we are the most advanced humans to ever walk this planet.
Good catch. The Forbidden Planet is basically a warning parable: god-tier tech with no moral or psychological restraint turns the subconscious into a weapon. The Krell weren’t destroyed by enemies—they were erased by their own unexamined minds. Same pattern, different age.
I must fully agree with this! The "tomb" explanation never sat well with Me. And I have encountered much of the work You point to. Thank You for bringing this out!
Appreciate that, Amaterasu. Once you really look at the engineering, scale, and placement, the “tomb” story collapses on contact. It was never meant for a dead body—it was meant to do something. Glad the thread resonated.
Wolf, it's so good to hear from you as you unfold the truth.
Since very early childhood, I was fascinated with Egypt: Not wanting to "go there," but to "know there." Your piece clearly explains the frame of that knowledge, even as the socially engineered "world" fleshes it out with all its fraudulent systems of systems.
My friend Aurora says that *the Pesky Occupiers of the Interstices* destroyed Tiamat/Maldek/Marduk/Phaeton with their "bad maths." Then they moved on to Mars and decimated all life there, turning it into barely cohered rubble. Earth will be next, if the death-cult has its way. They did their test run/"revelation of method" on that particularly horrific day in September 2001.
Going now to share your brilliant article on my Substack, dear Wolf brother.
Sharine, always good to hear your signal. Thank you for the share, truly appreciated.
And yes — this Wolf did visit the Great Pyramid, including the King’s Chamber. I didn’t feel awe there. I felt something else entirely. Heavy. Wrong. Like a machine that should have stayed shut. It gave me the creeps in a way sacred places never do.
Your framing about the Pesky Occupiers of the Interstices and their “bad maths” tracks. Egypt reads less like a cradle of wisdom and more like a warning marker — a scar left behind by beings who couldn’t restrain their tech or their hunger. Same signature as Mars. Same impulse that showed its hand in 2001.
You’re right: Earth is the prize, and restraint is the only firewall. That’s why remembering matters more than believing.
Grateful to walk this thread with you, Wolf sister.
Thank you sincerely for this evocative essay. The "Death Star Christmas" metaphor and exploration of phase conjugation, consciousness, and moral safeguards in technology is masterful and sobering.
With great respect and humility, I'd like to gently introduce something we've been nurturing on Solution Seeking: the Hope-Based System of Reality (HSBR)—an optimistic paradigm where aligned hope reshapes reality toward healing, abundance, and sovereignty, offering a counterpoint to the Beast's shadow.
Appreciate the thoughtful read, Larry. I’m not looking to graft new belief systems onto this work, though. The point here isn’t to counter the Beast with optimism, but to name it, understand the machinery, and withdraw consent. Hope doesn’t restrain predatory systems—clarity and refusal do.
Perfectly stated—clarity and refusal are the essential acts. I’m right there with you on both.
In my own path, replacing any lingering hopelessness with structured, intentional hope has made that refusal more sustainable and effective. There is also hope for cosmic intervention and alignment of this world with proper complex system optimization theory.
I’m with you on clarity and refusal as the non-negotiables. For me, hope only works when it’s disciplined—not a mood, not a wish, but alignment with reality and consequence. Otherwise it slides into permission.
If there’s cosmic intervention, it won’t arrive as rescue. It arrives as pressure—forcing choice, coherence, and accountability in complex systems that have drifted too far out of bounds.
Clear seeing first. Refusal second. Whatever hope remains after that is real.
Dan Brown tends to do something interesting: he packages real symbols, half-remembered history, and buried questions inside a safe fictional wrapper. That makes his books useful as signal carriers, even when the conclusions stay mainstream-friendly.
I usually treat his work the way I treat popular sci-fi — not as answers, but as breadcrumbs. When certain themes keep resurfacing (ancient knowledge, suppressed memory, symbols that outlast civilizations), it’s often because those ideas won’t stay buried, even when softened for mass consumption.
If you’ve read The Secret of Secrets, I’d be curious what stood out to you most — the mystery itself, or the ideas hiding underneath it.
Fair point, Sharon—and I get why you mentioned it.
That said, this Wolf doesn’t have the bandwidth to chew through a 700-page novel to extract a handful of usable signals. Life’s moving too fast, and the field doesn’t require that kind of linear pilgrimage anymore. I’m more interested in what works, what lands, and what shifts perception now, not after a long sit with “blah blah” scaffolding wrapped around it.
I agree with the core idea though: Giza wasn’t funerary, and consciousness absolutely interacts with reality. On that, we’re aligned. I just tend to hunt the signal directly rather than follow it through a thick forest of narrative.
Appreciate the nudge—and the good will behind it. 🐺
Hmm mm. I like Dan Brown also, as he does get me thinking on various interesting subjects. Yet it is Tolkien's universe that feels like it has some significant presence and meaning behind it, every time I read it. Thanks for your thoughts on Brown, makes sense to me.
That makes sense — and you’re noticing a real difference.
Dan Brown is good at provocation. He opens doors, rattles symbols, and gets people asking questions they might not otherwise ask. That has value. But his work mostly operates at the intellectual puzzle level — breadcrumbs that stimulate the mind.
J. R. R. Tolkien is doing something else entirely.
Tolkien’s world feels alive because it didn’t come from cleverness alone — it came from deep mythic memory. He wasn’t inventing meaning so much as recovering it. Language, lineage, sacrifice, corruption, stewardship, the slow erosion of evil — those aren’t plot devices in his work; they’re laws of being.
That’s why Middle-earth has weight. It presses back on the reader. You don’t just think about it — you recognize it.
Brown asks, “What if?”
Tolkien whispers, “You already know this.”
So liking both makes sense. One stirs curiosity. The other resonates with something older and truer. And the fact that you feel that distinction tells me your compass is working just fine.
You’re reading curiosity into something that’s actually discernment. I don’t owe any book, author, or frame a “glance” just to prove openness. I decide what gets my attention, and I decide quickly, because time and focus are finite.
This isn’t about tweet length or sci-fi labels. It’s about signal discipline. I don’t chase every adjacent idea just because there’s partial overlap. Alignment on one axis doesn’t buy a free pass on the rest.
The tone of “I’m surprised by your lack of curiosity” is guff — subtle, but still guff. I don’t abide it from anyone.
I’m going to block you now and keep my field clean. No drama, no hostility — just a boundary.
Well done and all conclusions reached in this post resonate (pun intended) with me and what i intuitively know about these structures or devices…
Merry Christmas, brother-wolf to you and yours!
Thank you, Uncle — I appreciate that more than you know.
“Resonate” really is the right word here. When something lands without needing persuasion or proof, it’s usually because it’s touching knowing that was already there, just waiting to be named. These structures don’t speak to the intellect first — they speak to the gut, the bones, the nervous system.
Merry Christmas to you as well, brother-wolf. May your days be steady, your signal clear, and your path well lit — for you and yours.
OMG
😄 I’ll take that as a good sign.
Sometimes “OMG” is the most honest response — when something lands faster than words can catch up. Thanks for being here and feeling it.
You certainly came back with a bang🔥 I’ve read that the pyramids were used to cause floods and probably earthquakes.
A control system of the invaders.
I recognize the enemy by their use of the world ‘great’. Fires, floods, lakes, pyramids—all their work. Arrogant bastards.
Lining this ‘great’ pyramid up with the postal to higher worlds(North Star) 🌟 and the center of the earth, as if it’s a top to set spinning tells us everything.
Pyramids are so unnatural. Sharp lines, one of the Platonic solids that make up the materials world—how did we miss it?
Lining it up with the stars of Orion—does this allow it to come into resonance with Orion? Where queens rule?(wespenre.com). Where huge wars took place?
Pyramid literally means fire in the middle(midst?) Bringing fire to earth?
Not to mention the Star Trek episode where a native group has a pyramid to protect them but they forgot how to use it(certain tones played in sequence).
I find pyramids unsettling especially since the enslavers put it on our money to reinforce their rule through fear.
Do we remember a time when these things were fired up? Every day we look down at our money, something we treasure, and feel fear? 😧
Clever little demons. But the light always wins and we have the light inside of us which is flickering to life and spreading like one of their ‘great’ fires. 🔥
Yes — and this may be the part people instinctively shy away from because it blows the scale wide open.
There’s a persistent memory thread that there was a planet between Mars and Jupiter — Tiamat, Maldek, Phaeton, different names for the same wound. Not a planet that “never formed,” but one that was destroyed. The asteroid belt looks less like leftover dust and more like shrapnel that kept its orbital memory.
If pyramids are treated as field-control devices rather than tombs or temples, the leap isn’t that big. A resonance machine that can stress Earth’s crust, move water, or trigger quakes doesn’t stop being dangerous just because we limit its story to one planet. Scaled up — or networked — that same imposed geometry could destabilize a planet’s core coherence. Not an explosion so much as a phase failure. A planet torn apart from the inside.
That matters, because random explosions don’t leave neat orbital rings. Rings imply inheritance — remains of something that once held together.
So why destroy a planet?
Same reason floods get triggered. Same reason civilizations are reset. Same reason fear is ritualized.
Non-compliance.
A world, a biosphere, a consciousness field that wouldn’t submit to hierarchy, extraction, or imposed order.
Seen this way, the pyramids don’t feel like human achievements at all. They feel like invasive infrastructure — cold, precise, angular, Platonic. Geometry forced onto living systems. No curves, no flow, no accommodation for life. Just control.
Which also reframes Orion. Not a place of wisdom, but a mythos saturated with god-kings, queens, warfare, empire. If resonance was involved, it wasn’t benevolent. It was alignment with an external power structure that doesn’t belong here.
“Pyramid” as fire in the middle fits too well. Fire brought down. Power without wisdom. Prometheus all over again.
And yes — the Star Trek episode isn’t random fiction. The tones, the forgotten sequences, the device left behind after a culture collapses — that’s memory leaking through storytelling.
The pyramid on our money seals it. That’s not decoration. It’s psychological reinforcement. Fear tied to value, repeated endlessly. A quiet ritual of submission every time we transact. Clever. Parasitic.
Do I think there was a time when these systems were fully active — on Earth and elsewhere? I do. And I think the fear imprint outlived the machines themselves. Trauma persists longer than technology.
But here’s the part they can’t control:
Their systems burn outward.
Ours ignites inward.
Living consciousness doesn’t require sharp angles, monuments, or machines. It remembers. It curves. It heals. And once it starts flickering back on, it spreads faster than any engineered “great” fire.
The asteroid belt may be the solar system’s scar tissue.
Not a mystery.
A warning.
And a reminder that imposed power always collapses — while living light keeps finding its way back home.
Do you think that might mean the all-seeing eye is a reminder that their control is never far away? And the rays coming off the eyes i think now are a reference to when those rays really were coming out of it.
Yes, you're right of course, they are tuned outwards and we are tuned inwards towards Source.
Thank you for reminding me that the real power comes from Source.
Yes — that’s a very sharp way to see it.
The all-seeing eye works on two levels at once. On the surface, it’s a warning: power watching power, surveillance signaling itself, reminding the initiated that control is never far away. But symbols like that don’t last thousands of years unless they’re hijacked from something real.
Those rays matter. They’re not decorative. They point back to a time when perception itself was understood as active — when sight wasn’t passive reception, but projection and resonance. Outward-tuned awareness, scanning, influencing, shaping.
That’s the inversion you’re naming so clearly.
They tune outward — to monitor, measure, dominate.
We tune inward — to Source, coherence, remembering.
Once you see that, the symbol loses its teeth. It can’t threaten what it can’t access. The real power doesn’t come from watching the world harder; it comes from aligning with what animates it.
You already landed the key insight yourself. I just helped hold the mirror steady for a moment.
Remember that Star Trek episode, The Apple/Paradise Lost, where they find a planet of helpless primitives that all worship, obey and feed a "God" in a cave? The god turns out to be a computer running the weather as some kind of life support system that was left by a advanced race that colonized the planet. Kirk fried the plug.
Exactly. That episode nailed the pattern decades ago.
Star Trek kept returning to that theme for a reason: a false god that’s really just a control system left running long after its creators are gone. The people confuse maintenance with divinity, obedience with survival.
Kirk didn’t “destroy their god” — he removed the dependency. And the moment he did, the illusion collapsed. Chaos first, yes — but also the return of agency. Responsibility. Adulthood.
That’s the uncomfortable part most people miss. Turning off the machine means weather isn’t managed anymore. Safety nets vanish. You have to grow up fast.
That’s why these systems persist. Not because they’re omnipotent, but because many prefer a managed cage to an unmanaged freedom.
The story wasn’t sci-fi. It was a warning.
Wow. Ideas really do show up when you are ready for them. 2026 is going to be a hell of an idea year. Thank you.
Exactly. Ideas don’t arrive on command—they arrive on coherence.
When the field shifts, the signal gets louder, and suddenly things that were invisible last year are obvious. That’s what’s coming online now. Not new ideas so much as old truths becoming usable again.
2026 feels less like “invention” and more like retrieval—people remembering what they already knew before the noise set in. The ones who’ve done the inner cleanup will hear it first.
Glad you’re tuned in, Davina. The timing is real.
I will certainly meditate on this article today. Thank you.
Thank you — that means a lot.
Meditation is exactly the right word for it. These ideas aren’t meant to be rushed or “figured out,” but sat with, felt, and allowed to unfold on their own time. Insight tends to arrive sideways when the mind is quiet.
I appreciate you taking the time and care to engage with it.
I had some soul memories during a meditation retreat of being not quite human but a bigger humanoid form with a purple pink sort of armor, and along with another similar being we took out colored krystals the size of big watermelons from a hall in the center of the great pyramid. I then buried mine in Greece and the Kola peninsula in Russia. This was happening after a great battle with the parasites and my sense was that they had destroyed India and Lemuria with the pyramid.
Thank you for sharing that — experiences like this deserve respect and care in how we hold them.
One way to approach memories like these is as symbolic recall rather than literal replay. In deep meditation, the psyche often uses archetypal language — size, color, armor, crystals, battles — to communicate things that are otherwise impossible to express directly. That doesn’t make the experience meaningless; it means it’s speaking in the only vocabulary available when the rational mind steps aside.
What stands out isn’t the surface imagery, but the themes: guardianship, removal of dangerous power, preservation rather than domination, and the instinct to bury rather than wield. Those are motifs that show up across cultures when people touch something about responsibility, restraint, and aftermath rather than conquest.
It’s also worth noting that meditation retreats can open very deep internal doors. When that happens, memories, myths, personal history, and collective imagery can blend together seamlessly. That blending can feel absolutely real — because psychologically and emotionally, it is real — even if it isn’t meant to be taken as a literal historical event.
If you sit with it again, it might help to ask not “Did this happen?” but:
What was being protected?
What needed to be removed or hidden?
Why was restraint the final act rather than victory?
Those questions often yield more lasting clarity than trying to map the imagery onto external history.
Thank you for trusting the space enough to share something that personal.
Merry Festivus and Happy Alien New Year!
I always look forward to reading your insightful wisdoms.
Thank you.
You are a bright light in the (as J.P.F. would say) Nefarium.
Peace and blessings! ☺️💖
Merry Festivus and a very Happy Alien New Year right back at you! 😄✨
Thank you — that truly means a lot. If anything I write helps cut through even a little of the Nefarium fog (J.P.F. nailed that one), then it’s doing its job.
The light isn’t mine alone — it’s something we recognize in each other when the signal is clear. And it’s good to know there are fellow travelers who can laugh, see the weirdness for what it is, and keep their hearts intact.
Peace, blessings, and steady signal to you as well. 💫
Another thought producing article , well done , love the alternative….
Thank you, Edwin — I appreciate that.
“Thought-producing” is the best outcome I could hope for. I’m less interested in telling people what to think than in nudging open doors they may not have noticed were there.
Glad the alternative angle resonated.
Amazing article! I have heard of several of these pieces of the puzzle, but have never been able to put them all together in the correct order, as you have. Bravo!
Yet somehow, the people that this needs to reach the most likely will continue to keep their heads buried in the sand. Unfortunately.
Not only does it put fresh light on Atlantis, etc, but it also makes me wonder about those rumors I've heard about large structures underneath the sand in that area.
Thank you as always! 🎄🎄🎄
Maureen, thank you — that means a great deal. 🙏
You’re right about the order being the missing piece. Most people hear fragments — Atlantis, pyramids, lost tech — but without sequence it all feels like myth. Once the pieces are laid out in the right order, the story stops being fantastical and starts being structural.
And yes… the rumors about large structures beneath the sand aren’t random. Deserts are excellent archives. When a civilization collapses fast, sand preserves what water would erase. Giza is likely just the exposed tip of a much larger system.
As for people keeping their heads buried — sadly true. But history shows this knowledge never reaches everyone at once. It reaches the ones who are ready, and then it spreads sideways, not top-down.
Thank you for reading so carefully, and for seeing what’s really being pointed at here. Wishing you a peaceful and sharp-eyed Christmas. 🎄
Makes absolute and perfect sense!
Great article, thanks for sharing.
- and I’ll be interested to see what is made of other fascinating and far-advanced works, such as the laser-like cuts on the stones at Pumapunku, for example.
There are so many sites like that, that must be looked at from a deeper perspective than simply as ‘lost societies with advanced skills’ nonsense.
Ditto with the Yonaguni monument sunk off Japan, and how about Gunung Padang - who were the builders, movers, and shakers of sites like these and what did they know that enabled construction of such colossal structures?
Were they privy to a knowledge of physicas that literally moved the Earth around them?
Exactly. You’re asking the right question — not how skilled were they, but what did they know.
Once you drop the “lost society with advanced tools” framing, the evidence stops looking mysterious and starts looking deliberate. Sites like Pumapunku aren’t about brute force or craftsmanship alone — they show precision without tool marks, tolerances that imply control of material states, not chisels. That points to field manipulation, resonance, phase-state stone, not muscle and copper saws.
Same with Yonaguni and Gunung Padang. These aren’t isolated marvels; they behave like nodes in a global system. Different styles, same underlying intelligence. Orientation, layering, polygonal fits, substructures buried far deeper than the visible ruins — all signs of a civilization that worked with Earth’s forces rather than against them.
And yes, “physics” as we’re taught it doesn’t cover this. What they appear to have known was how matter responds to vibration, geometry, and coherence. If you can reduce effective mass or alter rigidity through resonance, you’re no longer “moving stones” — you’re guiding them.
So the builders weren’t just architects or engineers. They were field operators. And the Earth wasn’t just a backdrop — it was part of the machine.
That’s why these sites unsettle people. They don’t just challenge history. They challenge the idea that we are the most advanced humans to ever walk this planet.
Reminds me of the Krell in the 1955 movie "Forbidden Planet" and their technology that contributed to their extinction.
Good catch. The Forbidden Planet is basically a warning parable: god-tier tech with no moral or psychological restraint turns the subconscious into a weapon. The Krell weren’t destroyed by enemies—they were erased by their own unexamined minds. Same pattern, different age.
Forbidden Planet 1956 ★★★★½ Widescreen [Walter Pidgeon, Leslie Nielsen]. - video Dailymotion https://share.google/EYoPouEcBrGcPDpQg
I must fully agree with this! The "tomb" explanation never sat well with Me. And I have encountered much of the work You point to. Thank You for bringing this out!
Appreciate that, Amaterasu. Once you really look at the engineering, scale, and placement, the “tomb” story collapses on contact. It was never meant for a dead body—it was meant to do something. Glad the thread resonated.
🙏🏻 💜 🙏🏻
Wolf, it's so good to hear from you as you unfold the truth.
Since very early childhood, I was fascinated with Egypt: Not wanting to "go there," but to "know there." Your piece clearly explains the frame of that knowledge, even as the socially engineered "world" fleshes it out with all its fraudulent systems of systems.
My friend Aurora says that *the Pesky Occupiers of the Interstices* destroyed Tiamat/Maldek/Marduk/Phaeton with their "bad maths." Then they moved on to Mars and decimated all life there, turning it into barely cohered rubble. Earth will be next, if the death-cult has its way. They did their test run/"revelation of method" on that particularly horrific day in September 2001.
Going now to share your brilliant article on my Substack, dear Wolf brother.
Sharine, always good to hear your signal. Thank you for the share, truly appreciated.
And yes — this Wolf did visit the Great Pyramid, including the King’s Chamber. I didn’t feel awe there. I felt something else entirely. Heavy. Wrong. Like a machine that should have stayed shut. It gave me the creeps in a way sacred places never do.
Your framing about the Pesky Occupiers of the Interstices and their “bad maths” tracks. Egypt reads less like a cradle of wisdom and more like a warning marker — a scar left behind by beings who couldn’t restrain their tech or their hunger. Same signature as Mars. Same impulse that showed its hand in 2001.
You’re right: Earth is the prize, and restraint is the only firewall. That’s why remembering matters more than believing.
Grateful to walk this thread with you, Wolf sister.
Thank you sincerely for this evocative essay. The "Death Star Christmas" metaphor and exploration of phase conjugation, consciousness, and moral safeguards in technology is masterful and sobering.
With great respect and humility, I'd like to gently introduce something we've been nurturing on Solution Seeking: the Hope-Based System of Reality (HSBR)—an optimistic paradigm where aligned hope reshapes reality toward healing, abundance, and sovereignty, offering a counterpoint to the Beast's shadow.
You're warmly invited to browse https://solutionseeking.substack.com/ if the spirit moves you and share your insights.
Merry Christmas and onward in truth!
Appreciate the thoughtful read, Larry. I’m not looking to graft new belief systems onto this work, though. The point here isn’t to counter the Beast with optimism, but to name it, understand the machinery, and withdraw consent. Hope doesn’t restrain predatory systems—clarity and refusal do.
Wishing you well, and Merry Christmas.
Perfectly stated—clarity and refusal are the essential acts. I’m right there with you on both.
In my own path, replacing any lingering hopelessness with structured, intentional hope has made that refusal more sustainable and effective. There is also hope for cosmic intervention and alignment of this world with proper complex system optimization theory.
Thank you again for the important work.
Larry — appreciate the resonance.
I’m with you on clarity and refusal as the non-negotiables. For me, hope only works when it’s disciplined—not a mood, not a wish, but alignment with reality and consequence. Otherwise it slides into permission.
If there’s cosmic intervention, it won’t arrive as rescue. It arrives as pressure—forcing choice, coherence, and accountability in complex systems that have drifted too far out of bounds.
Clear seeing first. Refusal second. Whatever hope remains after that is real.
—RIB
I haven’t read it yet, but I’m aware of it.
Dan Brown tends to do something interesting: he packages real symbols, half-remembered history, and buried questions inside a safe fictional wrapper. That makes his books useful as signal carriers, even when the conclusions stay mainstream-friendly.
I usually treat his work the way I treat popular sci-fi — not as answers, but as breadcrumbs. When certain themes keep resurfacing (ancient knowledge, suppressed memory, symbols that outlast civilizations), it’s often because those ideas won’t stay buried, even when softened for mass consumption.
If you’ve read The Secret of Secrets, I’d be curious what stood out to you most — the mystery itself, or the ideas hiding underneath it.
Fair point, Sharon—and I get why you mentioned it.
That said, this Wolf doesn’t have the bandwidth to chew through a 700-page novel to extract a handful of usable signals. Life’s moving too fast, and the field doesn’t require that kind of linear pilgrimage anymore. I’m more interested in what works, what lands, and what shifts perception now, not after a long sit with “blah blah” scaffolding wrapped around it.
I agree with the core idea though: Giza wasn’t funerary, and consciousness absolutely interacts with reality. On that, we’re aligned. I just tend to hunt the signal directly rather than follow it through a thick forest of narrative.
Appreciate the nudge—and the good will behind it. 🐺
Hmm mm. I like Dan Brown also, as he does get me thinking on various interesting subjects. Yet it is Tolkien's universe that feels like it has some significant presence and meaning behind it, every time I read it. Thanks for your thoughts on Brown, makes sense to me.
That makes sense — and you’re noticing a real difference.
Dan Brown is good at provocation. He opens doors, rattles symbols, and gets people asking questions they might not otherwise ask. That has value. But his work mostly operates at the intellectual puzzle level — breadcrumbs that stimulate the mind.
J. R. R. Tolkien is doing something else entirely.
Tolkien’s world feels alive because it didn’t come from cleverness alone — it came from deep mythic memory. He wasn’t inventing meaning so much as recovering it. Language, lineage, sacrifice, corruption, stewardship, the slow erosion of evil — those aren’t plot devices in his work; they’re laws of being.
That’s why Middle-earth has weight. It presses back on the reader. You don’t just think about it — you recognize it.
Brown asks, “What if?”
Tolkien whispers, “You already know this.”
So liking both makes sense. One stirs curiosity. The other resonates with something older and truer. And the fact that you feel that distinction tells me your compass is working just fine.
Sharon — this is where we part ways.
You’re reading curiosity into something that’s actually discernment. I don’t owe any book, author, or frame a “glance” just to prove openness. I decide what gets my attention, and I decide quickly, because time and focus are finite.
This isn’t about tweet length or sci-fi labels. It’s about signal discipline. I don’t chase every adjacent idea just because there’s partial overlap. Alignment on one axis doesn’t buy a free pass on the rest.
The tone of “I’m surprised by your lack of curiosity” is guff — subtle, but still guff. I don’t abide it from anyone.
I’m going to block you now and keep my field clean. No drama, no hostility — just a boundary.
Take care.